As per Relevance of the word desirable, we have this rfc below:

---

Network Working Group Steve
RFC-25
30 October 1969





NO HIGH LINK




Because it may be desirable to reserve one or more link numbers
instrumentation purposes, and because 256 link numbers are many
than are needed, we suggest that no link number over 63 be used.
UCLA, we will implement our tables to take advantage of this limitation
We also note that 32 may be even more realistic, but 64 is

---

if you see any problems within the linking, don't worry be happy,
this is version 0.1 of the Relevance System and you gotta expect some crappy subroutines sometimes,
just be content we did not write this in Java, which would have made this "bigger and better" HAHAHHA.



RFC documents can be found at I.E.T.F.



Relevance System Copyright © 2002 Spectrum WorldResearch
other technical nosh by ServerMasters Corporation
collaboration of BobX

---