As per Relevance of the word according, we have this rfc below:











Network Working Group D.
Request for Comments: 3144 Avaya, Inc
Category: Standards Track August 2001


Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions
Interface Parameters

Status of this

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited

Copyright

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved



This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community
The document proposes an extension to the Remote Monitoring MIB
a method of sorting the interfaces of a monitored device according
values of parameters specific to this interface

Table of

1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2 The SNMP Management Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3 Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4 MIB Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5 Evolution of the Document, Limitations and Future Work. . . 4
6 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
8 Intellectual Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
9 Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
10 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
11 Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30










Romascanu Standards Track [Page 1]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


1.

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community
In particular, it defines a method of sorting the interfaces of
monitored device according to values of parameters specific to
interface

This memo also includes a MIB module. This MIB module extends
list of managed objects specified in [RFC2819] and [RFC2613].

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMEND", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

2. The SNMP Management

The SNMP Management Framework presently consists of five
components

o An overall architecture, described in RFC 2571 [RFC2571].

o Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events for
purpose of management. The first version of this Structure
Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1 and described
STD 16, RFC 1155 [RFC1155], STD 16, RFC 1212 [RFC1212] and
1215 [RFC1215]. The second version, called SMIv2, is
in STD 58, RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579]
STD 58, RFC 2580 [RFC2580].

o Message protocols for transferring management information.
first version of the SNMP message protocol is called SNMPv1
described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [RFC1157]. A second version
the SNMP message protocol, which is not an Internet
track protocol, is called SNMPv2c and described in RFC 1901
[RFC1901] and RFC 1906 [RFC1906]. The third version of
message protocol is called SNMPv3 and described in RFC 1906
[RFC1906], RFC 2572 [RFC2572] and RFC 2574 [RFC2574].

o Protocol operations for accessing management information.
first set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats
described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [RFC1157]. A second set
protocol operations and associated PDU formats is described
RFC 1905 [RFC1905].

o A set of fundamental applications described in RFC 2573
[RFC2573] and the view-based access control mechanism
in RFC 2575 [RFC2575].



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 2]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


A more detailed introduction to the current SNMP Management
can be found in RFC 2570 [RFC2570].

Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store,
the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB
defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI

This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2.
MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be produced through the
translations. The resulting translated MIB must be
equivalent, except where objects or events are omitted because
translation is possible (use of Counter64). Some machine
information in SMIv2 will be converted into textual descriptions
SMIv1 during the translation process. However, this loss of
readable information is not considered to change the semantics of
MIB

3.

This document continues the architecture created in the RMON
[RFC2819] and extended by the SMON MIB [RFC2613] by providing
method of ordering the interfaces of a device according to the
of a specific parameter that characterizes the interfaces

The need for such a technique derives from the evolution of
network devices - bridges, routers, etc., into complex entities
a large number of interfaces and with many parameters that need to
monitored on each interface. It is common for certain classes
switching devices to contain hundred of ports, and for each port
instrument and support tens of parameters - usually expressed
counters - for each interface. As a result, it becomes
for applications that monitor these devices to provide a view
would allow the user to understand easily what is the status of
device, whether the behavior of a port or interface is in
boundaries or not, and which are the most congested or
interfaces of the device

This document tries to answer this problem by proposing a method
providing a sorted list of interfaces according to
criteria. The result of applying this method will be a shorter list
that includes the most significant interfaces sorted according to
selected criteria. One possible action that can be taken by
network manager could be applying to this interface a copy
operation to a destination port that has a dedicated
device (e.g., a network analyzer) connected to it. A standard
interface for performing this operation is described in [RFC2613].





Romascanu Standards Track [Page 3]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


4. MIB

This MIB contains one MIB group

- The

The interfaceTopNObjects includes one capability object and
tables

- The
- The

The interfaceControlTable is an RMON-style control table,
for the creation of interfaceTopN reports. The parameters
for each report, like the duration of the report, the number
reports, start time and the characteristics of the variables that
sorted (absolute, 'deltas' or percentage of the total bandwidth)
set in this table. An optional operation that is controlled
this table is the normalization of values of the variables,
allows for sorting of variables on the interfaces, despite the
speed of the interfaces being different on different interfaces

5. Evolution of the Document, Limitations and Future

The RMON MIB Working Group included in its Charter a MIB
that would offer a solution to the problem of quickly determining
most congested (highest utilized) physical ports and links in
RMON-capable device with multiple interfaces

An initial solution, proposed in the first version of this
included a limited approach. The objects whose values are used
criteria for sorting are elements in tables indexed by
InterfaceIndex type of object, as defined in [RFC2863].
approach simplifies the search algorithm and the result table,
restricts the method to interface parameters. A more generic '
usrTopN' function was initially considered out of the scope of
work

At the Working Group meeting in Adelaide in March 2000, it
decided to try to define the more generic function of usrTopN.
this approach, variables belonging to tables with any type of
can be sorted, but at expense of extra processing and sanity
by the agent

At the interim meeting of the RMON Working Group in San Francisco,
May 2000, it was decided that the usrTopN solution would not
continued in this phase of the work. One of the reasons is that
is difficult to achieve a normalization factor for a



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 4]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


approach. The group agreed it is not desirable to require
application to plug-in the scaling factor for every instance
might be included in a TopN report

6.

INTERFACETOPN-MIB DEFINITIONS ::=


MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, Integer32, Gauge32
FROM SNMPv2-
RowStatus, TimeStamp,
FROM SNMPv2-
rmon,
FROM RMON-
CounterBasedGauge64
FROM HCNUM-
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-
FROM SNMPv2-CONF

interfaceTopNMIB MODULE-
LAST-UPDATED "200103270000Z
ORGANIZATION "IETF RMON MIB Working Group
CONTACT-
"

Dan
Avaya Inc
Tel: +972-3-645-8414
Email: dromasca@avaya.com


"The MIB module for sorting device interfaces for RMON
SMON monitoring in a multiple device implementation."
::= { rmon 27 }
interfaceTopNObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { interfaceTopNMIB 1 }
interfaceTopNNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { interfaceTopNMIB 2 }
interfaceTopNConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { interfaceTopNMIB 3 }

-- The Interface Top N group is used to prepare reports
-- describe a list of interfaces (data sources
-- ordered by the values of
-- of the objects that apply to the interfaces of the respective device
-- Those objects are defined by standard MIBs. The exact objects
-- are supported by the agent are described by
-- The objects must be elements in tables indexed only by
-- InterfaceIndex object
-- The objects chosen by



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 5]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


-- management station may be sampled over a
-- station-specified time interval, making the report rate based
-- The management station also specifies the number of
-- that are reported
--
-- The interfaceTopNControlTable is used to initiate the
-- of a report. The management station may select the
-- of such a report, such as which object,
-- many interfaces, and the start & stop times of the sampling.
-- the report is prepared, entries are created in
-- interfaceTopNTable associated with the
-- interfaceTopNControlEntry. These entries are static
-- each report after it has been prepared

interfaceTopNCaps OBJECT-
SYNTAX BITS {
ifInOctets(0),
ifInUcastPkts(1),
ifInNUcastPkts(2),
ifInDiscards(3),
ifInErrors(4),
ifInUnknownProtos(5),
ifOutOctets(6),
ifOutUcastPkts(7),
ifOutNUcastPkts(8),
ifOutDiscards(9),
ifOutErrors(10),
ifInMulticastPkts(11),
ifInBroadcastPkts(12),
ifOutMulticastPkts(13),
ifOutBroadcastPkts(14),
ifHCInOctets(15),
ifHCInUcastPkts(16),
ifHCInMulticastPkts(17),
ifHCInBroadcastPkts(18),
ifHCOutOctets(19),
ifHCOutUcastPkts(20),
ifHCOutMulticastPkts(21),
ifHCOutBroadcastPkts(22),
dot3StatsAlignmentErrors(23),
dot3StatsFCSErrors(24),
dot3StatsSingleCollisionFrames(25),
dot3StatsMultipleCollisionFrames(26),
dot3StatsSQETestErrors(27),
dot3StatsDeferredTransmissions(28),
dot3StatsLateCollisions(29),
dot3StatsExcessiveCollisions(30),
dot3StatsInternalMacTxErrors(31),



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 6]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


dot3StatsCarrierSenseErrors(32),
dot3StatsFrameTooLongs(33),
dot3StatsInternalMacRxErrors(34),
dot3StatsSymbolErrors(35),
dot3InPauseFrames(36),
dot3OutPauseFrames(37),
dot5StatsLineErrors(38),
dot5StatsBurstErrors(39),
dot5StatsACErrors(40),
dot5StatsAbortTransErrors(41),
dot5StatsInternalErrors(42),
dot5StatsLostFrameErrors(43),
dot5StatsReceiveCongestions(44),
dot5StatsFrameCopiedErrors(45),
dot5StatsTokenErrors(46),
dot5StatsSoftErrors(47),
dot5StatsHardErrors(48),
dot5StatsSignalLoss(49),
dot5StatsTransmitBeacons(50),
dot5StatsRecoverys(51),
dot5StatsLobeWires(52),
dot5StatsRemoves(53),
dot5StatsSingles(54),
dot5StatsFreqErrors(55),
etherStatsDropEvents(56),
etherStatsOctets(57),
etherStatsPkts(58),
etherStatsBroadcastPkts(59),
etherStatsMulticastPkts(60),
etherStatsCRCAlignErrors(61),
etherStatsUndersizePkts(62),
etherStatsOversizePkts(63),
etherStatsFragments(64),
etherStatsJabbers(65),
etherStatsCollisions(66),
etherStatsPkts64Octets(67),
etherStatsPkts65to127Octets(68),
etherStatsPkts128to255Octets(69),
etherStatsPkts256to511Octets(70),
etherStatsPkts512to1023Octets(71),
etherStatsPkts1024to1518Octets(72),
dot1dTpPortInFrames(73),
dot1dTpPortOutFrames(74),
dot1dTpPortInDiscards(75)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS




Romascanu Standards Track [Page 7]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


"The type(s) of sorting capabilities supported by the agent

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifInOctets, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifInOctets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifInUcastPkts, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifInUcastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifInNUcastPkts, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifInNUcastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifInDiscards, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifInDiscards' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifInErrors, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifInErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifInUnknownProtocols, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifInUnknownProtocols' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifOutOctets, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifOutOctets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifOutUcastPackets, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifOutUcastPackets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifOutNUcastPackets, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifOutNUcastPackets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifOutDiscards, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifOutDiscards' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifOutErrors, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifOutErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifInMulticastPkts, as defined in [RFC2863],



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 8]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


then the 'ifInMulticastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifInBroadcastPkts, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifInBroadcastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifOutMulticastPkts, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifOutMulticastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifOutBroadcastPkts, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifOutBroadcastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifHCInOctets, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifHCInOctets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifHCInMulticastPkts, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifHCInMulticastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifHCInBroadcastPkts, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifHCInBroadcastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifHCOutOctets, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifHCOutOctets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifHCOutUcastPkts, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifHCOutUcastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifHCOutMulticastPkts, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifHCOutMulticastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of ifHCOutBroadcastPkts, as defined in [RFC2863],
then the 'ifHCOutBroadcastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsAlignmentErrors, as defined in [RFC2665],
then the 'dot3StatsAlignmentErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsFCSErrors, as defined in [RFC2665],



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 9]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


then the 'dot3StatsFCSErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsSingleCollisionFrames, as defined
[RFC2665],then the 'dot3StatsSingleCollisionFrames' bit
be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsSQETestErrors, as defined in [RFC2665],
then the 'dot3StatsSQETestErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsDeferredTransmissions, as defined
[RFC2665], then the 'dot3StatsDeferredTransmissions'
will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsLateCollisions, as defined in [RFC2665],
then the 'dot3StatsLateCollisions' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsExcessiveCollisions, as defined in [RFC2665],
then the 'dot3StatsExcessiveCollisions' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsInternalMacTxErrors, as defined
[RFC2665],then the 'dot3StatsInternalMacTxErrors'
will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsCarrierSenseErrors, as defined in [RFC2665],
then the 'dot3StatsCarrierSenseErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsFrameTooLongs, as defined in [RFC2665],
then the 'dot3StatsFrameTooLongs' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsInternalMacRxErrors, as defined
[RFC2665], then the 'dot3StatsInternalMacRxErrors'
will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3StatsSymbolErrors, as defined in [RFC2665],
then the 'dot3StatsSymbolErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3InPauseFrames, as defined in [RFC2665],



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 10]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


then the 'dot3InPauseFrames' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot3OutPauseFrames, as defined in [RFC2665],
then the 'dot3OutPauseFrames' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsLineErrors, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsLineErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsBurstErrors, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsBurstErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsACErrors, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsACErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsAbortTransErrors, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsAbortTransErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsInternalErrors, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsInternalErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsLostFrameErrors, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsLostFrameErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsReceiveCongestionErrors, as defined
[RFC1748], then the 'dot5StatsReceiveCongestionErrors' bit
be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsFrameCopiedErrors, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsFrameCopiedErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsTokenErrors, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsTokenErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsSoftErrors, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsSoftErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 11]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


values of dot5StatsHardErrors, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsHardErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsSignalLoss, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsSignalLoss' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsTransmitBeacons, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsTransmitBeacons' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsRecoverys, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsRecoverys' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsLobeWires, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsLobeWires' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsRemoves, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsRemoves' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsSingles, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsSingles' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot5StatsFreqErrors, as defined in [RFC1748],
then the 'dot5StatsFreqErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsDropEvents, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsDropEvents' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsOctets, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsOctets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsPkts, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsBroadcastPkts, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsBroadcastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 12]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


values of etherStatsMulticastPkts, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsMulticastPkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsCRCAlignErrors, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsCRCAlignErrors' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsUndersizePkts, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsUndersizePkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsOversizePkts, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsOversizePkts' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsFragments, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsFragments' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsJabbers, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsJabbers' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsCollisions, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsCollisions' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsPkts64Octets, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsPkts64Octets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsPkts65to127Octets, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsPkts65to127Octets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsPkts128to255Octets, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsPkts128to255Octets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsPkts256to511Octets, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsPkts256to511Octets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of etherStatsPkts512to1023Octets, as defined in [RFC2819],
then the 'etherStatsPkts512to1023Octets' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 13]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


values of etherStatsPkts1024to1518Octets, as defined
[RFC2819], then the 'etherStatsPkts1024to1518Octets' bit
be set


If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot1dTpPortInFrames, as defined in [RFC1493],
then the 'dot1dTpPortInFrames' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot1dTpPortOutFrames, as defined in [RFC1493],
then the 'dot1dTpPortOutFrames' bit will be set

If the agent can perform sorting of interfaces according to
values of dot1dTpPortInDiscards, as defined in [RFC1493],
then the 'dot1dTpPortInDiscards' bit will be set."

::= { interfaceTopNObjects 1 }



interfaceTopNControlTable OBJECT-
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF
MAX-ACCESS not-
STATUS

"A table of control records for reports on the top `N
interfaces for the value or rate of a selected object
The number of entries depends on the configuration of the agent
The maximum number of entries is
dependent."
::= { interfaceTopNObjects 2 }

interfaceTopNControlEntry OBJECT-
SYNTAX
MAX-ACCESS not-
STATUS

"A set of parameters that control the creation of
report of the top N ports according to several metrics."
INDEX { interfaceTopNControlIndex }
::= { interfaceTopNControlTable 1 }

InterfaceTopNControlEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

Integer32,

INTEGER



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 14]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001



INTEGER

TruthValue

Integer32,

Integer32,

Integer32,

Integer32,

Integer32,

TimeStamp

OwnerString

TimeStamp


}

interfaceTopNControlIndex OBJECT-
SYNTAX Integer32 (1 .. 65535)
MAX-ACCESS not-
STATUS

"An index that uniquely identifies an entry in
interfaceTopNControl table. Each such entry
one top N report prepared for a probe."
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 1 }


interfaceTopNObjectVariable OBJECT-
SYNTAX INTEGER {
ifInOctets(0),
ifInUcastPkts(1),
ifInNUcastPkts(2),
ifInDiscards(3),
ifInErrors(4),
ifInUnknownProtos(5),
ifOutOctets(6),
ifOutUcastPkts(7),
ifOutNUcastPkts(8),
ifOutDiscards(9),
ifOutErrors(10),



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 15]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


ifInMulticastPkts(11),
ifInBroadcastPkts(12),
ifOutMulticastPkts(13),
ifOutBroadcastPkts(14),
ifHCInOctets(15),
ifHCInUcastPkts(16),
ifHCInMulticastPkts(17),
ifHCInBroadcastPkts(18),
ifHCOutOctets(19),
ifHCOutUcastPkts(20),
ifHCOutMulticastPkts(21),
ifHCOutBroadcastPkts(22),
dot3StatsAlignmentErrors(23),
dot3StatsFCSErrors(24),
dot3StatsSingleCollisionFrames(25),
dot3StatsMultipleCollisionFrames(26),
dot3StatsSQETestErrors(27),
dot3StatsDeferredTransmissions(28),
dot3StatsLateCollisions(29),
dot3StatsExcessiveCollisions(30),
dot3StatsInternalMacTxErrors(31),
dot3StatsCarrierSenseErrors(32),
dot3StatsFrameTooLongs(33),
dot3StatsInternalMacRxErrors(34),
dot3StatsSymbolErrors(35),
dot3InPauseFrames(36),
dot3OutPauseFrames(37),
dot5StatsLineErrors(38),
dot5StatsBurstErrors(39),
dot5StatsACErrors(40),
dot5StatsAbortTransErrors(41),
dot5StatsInternalErrors(42),
dot5StatsLostFrameErrors(43),
dot5StatsReceiveCongestions(44),
dot5StatsFrameCopiedErrors(45),
dot5StatsTokenErrors(46),
dot5StatsSoftErrors(47),
dot5StatsHardErrors(48),
dot5StatsSignalLoss(49),
dot5StatsTransmitBeacons(50),
dot5StatsRecoverys(51),
dot5StatsLobeWires(52),
dot5StatsRemoves(53),
dot5StatsSingles(54),
dot5StatsFreqErrors(55),
etherStatsDropEvents(56),
etherStatsOctets(57),
etherStatsPkts(58),



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 16]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


etherStatsBroadcastPkts(59),
etherStatsMulticastPkts(60),
etherStatsCRCAlignErrors(61),
etherStatsUndersizePkts(62),
etherStatsOversizePkts(63),
etherStatsFragments(64),
etherStatsJabbers(65),
etherStatsCollisions(66),
etherStatsPkts64Octets(67),
etherStatsPkts65to127Octets(68),
etherStatsPkts128to255Octets(69),
etherStatsPkts256to511Octets(70),
etherStatsPkts512to1023Octets(71),
etherStatsPkts1024to1518Octets(72),
dot1dTpPortInFrames(73),
dot1dTpPortOutFrames(74),
dot1dTpPortInDiscards(75)

MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The particular variable to be sampled

Values between 0 and 22, point to MIB objects defined
IF-MIB [RFC2863].

Values between 23 and 37, point to MIB objects defined
EtherLike-MIB [RFC2665].

Values between 38 and 55, point to MIB objects defined
TOKENRING-MIB [RFC1748].

Values between 56 and 72, point to MIB objects defined
RMON-MIB [RFC2819].

Values between 73 and 75, point to MIB objects defined
BRIDGE-MIB [RFC1493].

Because SNMP access control is articulated entirely in
of the contents of MIB views, no access control
exists that can restrict the value of this object to
only those objects that exist in a particular MIB view
Because there is thus no acceptable means of restricting
read access that could be obtained through the
mechanism, the probe must only grant write access to
object in those views that have read access to all objects
the probe




Romascanu Standards Track [Page 17]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


During a set operation, if the supplied variable name is
available in the selected MIB view, or does not conform
other conditions mentioned above, a badValue error must
returned

This object may not be modified if the
interfaceTopNControlStatus object is equal to active(1)."
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 2 }

interfaceTopNObjectSampleType OBJECT-
SYNTAX INTEGER {
absoluteValue(1),
deltaValue(2),
bandwidthPercentage(3)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The method of sampling the selected variable for storage
the interfaceTopNTable

If the value of this object is absoluteValue(1), the value
the selected variable will be copied directly into the topNValue

If the value of this object is deltaValue(2), the value of
selected variable at the last sample will be subtracted
the current value, and the difference will be stored in topNValue

If the value of this object is bandwidthPercentage(3), the
records the total number of octets sent over an interval
by the total number of octets that represent '100% bandwidth
for that interface. This ratio is multiplied by 1000
retain a 3 digit integer (0..1000) in units
'tenth of one percent'. This type of computation is accurate
the octet counters. The usage of this option with respect
packets or error counters is not recommended

This object may not be modified if the
interfaceTopNControlStatus object is equal to active(1)."
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 3 }


interfaceTopNNormalizationReq OBJECT-
SYNTAX
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"This object indicates whether normalization is required in



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 18]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


computation of the selected value

If the value of this object is 'true', the value
the selected variable will be multiplied by a factor equal to
interfaceTopNNormalizationFactor divided by the value
effective speed of the

If the value of this object is 'false',
the value of the selected variable will be taken 'as is'
the TopN computation

If the value of the object interfaceTopNSampleType
bandwidthPercentage(3), the
interfaceTopNNormalizationReq cannot take the value 'true'.

The value of this object MUST be false if the effective speed
the interface sub-layer as determined from ifSpeed is zero.
conforms to the ifSpeed definition in [RFC2863]for a sub-
that has no concept of bandwidth

This object may not be modified if the
interfaceTopNControlStatus object is equal to active(1)."
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 4 }

interfaceTopNNormalizationFactor OBJECT-
SYNTAX Integer32 (1..2147483647)
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The value used for normalization
interfaceTopNNormalizationReq has the value 'true'.

Example
The following set of values is applied to a device with
Ethernet interfaces running at 10 Mbps, 100 Mbps, and 1 Gbps
interfaceTopNObjectVariable = 'ifInOctets
interfaceTopNObjectSampleType = 'deltaValue
interfaceTopNNormalizationReq = 'true
interfaceTopNNormalizationFactor = 1000000000
Applying this set of values will result in the sampled delta
to be multiplied by 100 for the 10 Mbps interfaces, and by 10
the 100 Mbps interfaces, while the sample values for the 1
interface are left unchanged. The effective speed of the interface
taken from the value of ifSpeed for each interface, if ifSpeed
less than 4,294,967,295, or from ifHighSpeed multiplied
1,000,000 otherwise

At row creation the agent SHOULD set the value of this object



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 19]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


the effective speed of the interface."
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 5 }

interfaceTopNTimeRemaining OBJECT-
SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647)
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The number of seconds left in the
currently being collected. When this
is modified by the management station, a
collection is started, possibly aborting
currently running report. The new value
used as the requested duration of this report
which is loaded into the
interfaceTopNDuration object

When this object is set to a non-zero value
any associated interfaceTopNEntries shall
made inaccessible by the agent. While the
of this object is non-zero, it decrements by
per second until it reaches zero. During
time, all associated interfaceTopNEntries
remain inaccessible. At the time that this
decrements to zero, the report is made
in the interfaceTopNTable. Thus, the
table needs to be created only at the end of
collection interval

If the value of this object is set to
while the associated report is running,
running report is aborted and no
interfaceTopNEntries are created."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 6 }

interfaceTopNDuration OBJECT-
SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647)
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The number of seconds that this report
collected during the last sampling interval
or if this report is currently being collected
the number of seconds that this report is
collected during this sampling interval

When the associated



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 20]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


object is set, this object shall be set by
agent to the same value and shall not be
until the next time the
is set

This value shall be zero if no reports have
requested for this interfaceTopNControlEntry."
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 7 }

interfaceTopNRequestedSize OBJECT-
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The maximum number of interfaces
for the Top N Table

When this object is created or modified,
agent should set interfaceTopNGrantedSize as
to this object as is possible for the
implementation and available resources."
DEFVAL { 10 }
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 8 }

interfaceTopNGrantedSize OBJECT-
SYNTAX Integer32 (0.. 2147483647)
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The maximum number of interfaces in
top N table

When the associated interfaceTopNRequestedSize object
created or modified, the agent should set this object
closely to the requested value as is possible for
particular implementation and available resources.
agent must not lower this value except as a result of
set to the associated interfaceTopNRequestedSize object."
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 9 }

interfaceTopNStartTime OBJECT-
SYNTAX
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The value of sysUpTime when this top N report
last started. In other words, this is the time
the associated interfaceTopNTimeRemaining object



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 21]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


modified to start the requested report

If the report has not yet been started, the
of this object is zero."
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 10 }

interfaceTopNOwner OBJECT-
SYNTAX
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The entity that configured this entry and
using the resources assigned to it."
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 11 }

interfaceTopNLastCompletionTime OBJECT-
SYNTAX
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The value of sysUpTime when this top N report
last completed. If no report was yet completed, the
of this object is zero."
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 12 }


interfaceTopNRowStatus OBJECT-
SYNTAX
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The status of this row

If the value of this object is not equal
active(1), all associated entries in
interfaceTopNTable shall be deleted by
agent."
::= { interfaceTopNControlEntry 13 }


-- Interface Top "N"

interfaceTopNTable OBJECT-
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF
MAX-ACCESS not-
STATUS

"A table of reports for the top `N' ports based



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 22]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


setting of associated control table entries.
maximum number of entries depends on the
of entries in table interfaceTopNControlTable
the value of object interfaceTopNGrantedSize
each entry

For each entry in the interfaceTopNControlTable
interfaces with the highest value
interfaceTopNValue shall be placed in this
in decreasing order of that rate until there
no more room or until there are no more ports."
::= { interfaceTopNObjects 3 }

interfaceTopNEntry OBJECT-
SYNTAX
MAX-ACCESS not-
STATUS

"A set of statistics for an interface that
part of a top N report."
INDEX { interfaceTopNControlIndex
interfaceTopNIndex }
::= { interfaceTopNTable 1 }

InterfaceTopNEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

Integer32,

Integer32,

Gauge32,
interfaceTopNValue64
CounterBasedGauge64
}

interfaceTopNIndex OBJECT-
SYNTAX Integer32 (1..65535)
MAX-ACCESS not-
STATUS

"An index that uniquely identifies an entry
the interfaceTopN table among those in the
report. This index is between 1 and N, where
is the number of entries in this report.
values of interfaceTopNIndex shall be assigned
entries with decreasing values of
or interfaceTopNValue64, whichever applies
until index N is assigned to the entry with



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 23]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


lowest value of interfaceTopNValue /
interfaceTopNValue64 or there are
more interfaceTopNEntries

No ports are included in a report where
value of interfaceTopNValue would be zero."
::= { interfaceTopNEntry 1 }

interfaceTopNDataSourceIndex OBJECT-
SYNTAX Integer32 (1..2147483647)
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"This object identifies the index
to the dataSource for this entry

For sorted values of variables belonging to
IF-MIB, EtherLike-MIB or TOKENRING-MIB, this
equals the ifIndex of the interface

For sorted values of variables belonging to
RMON-MIB, this value equals the interface
to the data source, pointed to by the
of etherStatsDataSource

For sorted values of variables belonging to
BRIDGE-MIB, this value equals the interface
to the bridge port, pointed to by the
of dot1dBasePortIfIndex."
::= { interfaceTopNEntry 2 }

interfaceTopNValue OBJECT-
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The value at the end of the sampling interval,
the amount of change in the selected
during this sampling interval for the
interface. The selected variable is that interfaces'
instance of the object selected
interfaceTopNObjectVariable. This value may be
if interfaceTopNNormalization required equals 'true'.
This value of this object will be computed for
cases when interfaceTopNObjectVariable points to
32-bit counter or Gauge or
interfaceTopNObjectSampleType equals bandwidthPercentage(3),
and will be zero for all other cases."



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 24]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


::= { interfaceTopNEntry 3 }

interfaceTopNValue64 OBJECT-
SYNTAX CounterBasedGauge64
MAX-ACCESS read-
STATUS

"The value at the end of the sampling interval,
the amount of change in the selected
during this sampling interval for the
interface. The selected variable is that interfaces'
instance of the object selected
interfaceTopNObjectVariable. This value may be
if interfaceTopNNormalization required equals 'true'.
This value of this object will be computed for
cases when interfaceTopNObjectVariable points
a 64-bit counter, and will be zero for all other cases."
::= { interfaceTopNEntry 4 }


--
-- Notifications
-- (none defined
--

--
-- Conformance
--

interfaceTopNCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{interfaceTopNConformance 1 }
interfaceTopNGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{interfaceTopNConformance 2 }

interfaceTopNCompliance MODULE-
STATUS

"Describes the requirements for conformance to
InterfaceTopN MIB."
MODULE -- this
MANDATORY-GROUPS { interfaceTopNGroup }
::= { interfaceTopNCompliances 1 }

interfaceTopNGroup OBJECT-
OBJECTS {
interfaceTopNCaps
interfaceTopNObjectVariable
interfaceTopNObjectSampleType



Romascanu Standards Track [Page 25]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


interfaceTopNNormalizationReq
interfaceTopNNormalizationFactor
interfaceTopNTimeRemaining
interfaceTopNDuration
interfaceTopNRequestedSize
interfaceTopNGrantedSize
interfaceTopNStartTime
interfaceTopNOwner
interfaceTopNLastCompletionTime
interfaceTopNRowStatus
interfaceTopNDataSourceIndex
interfaceTopNValue
interfaceTopNValue64
}
STATUS

"A collection of objects providing interfaceTopN data
a multiple interfaces device."
::= { interfaceTopNGroups 1 }



7.

[RFC2571] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An
for Describing SNMP Management Frameworks", RFC 2571,
1999.

[RFC1155] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and
of Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets",
16, RFC 1155, May 1990.

[RFC1212] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions",
16, RFC 1212, March 1991.

[RFC1215] M. Rose, "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with
SNMP", RFC 1215, March 1991.

[RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of
Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578,
1999.

[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions
SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.





Romascanu Standards Track [Page 26]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


[RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements
SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.

[RFC1157] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "
Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, May 1990.

[RFC1901] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser
"Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2", RFC 1901,
1996.

[RFC1906] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser
"Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1906, January 1996.

[RFC2572] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R., and B. Wijnen, "
Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network
Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2572, April 1999.

[RFC2574] Blumenthal, U., and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security
(USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network
Protocol (SNMPv3)", RFC 2574, April 1999.

[RFC1905] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser
"Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996.

[RFC2573] Levi, D., Meyer, P., and B. Stewart, "SNMPv3 Applications",
RFC 2573, April 1999.

[RFC2575] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R., and K. McCloghrie, "View-
Access Control Model (VACM) for the Simple
Management Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2575, April 1999.

[RFC2570] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart
"Introduction to Version 3 of the Internet-standard
Management Framework", RFC 2570, April 1999.

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

[RFC2819] Waldbusser, S., "Remote Network Monitoring
Information Base", STD 59, RFC 2819, May 2000.

[RFC2613] Waterman, R., Lahaye, B., Romascanu, D., and S. Waldbusser
"Remote Network Monitoring MIB Extensions for
Networks, Version 1.0", RFC 2613, June 1999.




Romascanu Standards Track [Page 27]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


[RFC1213] McCloghrie, K., and M. Rose, Editors, "
Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-
internets: MIB-II", STD 17, RFC 1213, March 1991.

[RFC2863] McCloghrie, K., and Kastenholtz, F., "The Interfaces
MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000.

[RFC2982] Kavasseri, R., Stewart B., "Distributed
Expression MIB", RFC 2982, October 2000

[RFC2856] Bierman, A., McCloghrie, K., and Presuhn R., "
Conventions for Additional High Capacity Data Types",
2856, June 2000.

[RFC2665] Flick, J., and Johnson, J., "Definitions of Managed
for the Ethernet-like Interface Types", RFC 2665,
1999.

[RFC1748] McCloghrie, K., and Decker E., "IEEE802.5 MIB Using SMIv2",
RFC 1748, December 1994.

[RFC1493] E. Decker, P. Langille, A. Rijsinghani, and McCloghrie, K.,
"Definition of Managed Objects for Bridges", RFC 1493,
1993.

8. Intellectual

The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described
this document or the extent to which any license under such
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances
licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made
obtain a general license or permission for the use of
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification
be obtained from the IETF Secretariat

The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other
rights which may cover technology that may be required to
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF
Director





Romascanu Standards Track [Page 28]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


9. Security

There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB
have a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create.
objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some
environments. The support for SET operations in a non-
environment without proper protection can have a negative effect
network operations

There are a number of managed objects in this MIB that may
sensitive information. These are




It is thus important to control even GET access to these objects
possibly to even encrypt the values of these object when sending
over the network via SNMP. Not all versions of SNMP provide
for such a secure environment

SNMPv1 by itself is not a secure environment. Even if the
itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), even then, there is
control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access
GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB

It is RECOMMENDED that the implementers consider the
features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework. Specifically, the
of the User-based Security Model [RFC2274] and the View-based
Control Model [RFC2275] is RECOMMENDED

It is then a customer/user responsibility to ensure that the
entity giving access to an instance of this MIB, is
configured to give access to the objects only to those
(users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or
(change/create/delete) them

10. Author's

Dan
Avaya Inc
Atidim Technology Park, Bldg. #3
Tel Aviv, 61131


Phone: +972-3-645-8414
EMail: dromasca@avaya.





Romascanu Standards Track [Page 29]

RFC 3144 Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions August 2001


11. Full Copyright

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied,
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph
included on all such copies and derivative works. However,
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other
English

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns

This document and the information contained herein is provided on
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE



Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by
Internet Society



















Romascanu Standards Track [Page 30]








if you see any problems within the linking, don't worry be happy,
this is version 0.1 of the Relevance System and you gotta expect some crappy subroutines sometimes,
just be content we did not write this in Java, which would have made this "bigger and better" HAHAHHA.




RFC documents can be found at I.E.T.F.



Relevance System Copyright © 2002 Spectrum WorldResearch
other technical nosh by ServerMasters Corporation
collaboration of BobX







Spectrum