As per Relevance of the word assigned, we have this rfc below:
Network Working Group J.
Request for Comments: 870 J.
Obsoletes RFCs: 820, October 1983
790, 776, 770, 762, 758, 755,
750, 739, 604, 503, 433, 349
Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93
ASSIGNED
This Network Working Group Request for Comments documents the
assigned values from several series of numbers used in network
implementations. This RFC will be updated periodically, and in any
current information can be obtained from Joyce Reynolds. The
of numbers is also handled by Joyce. If you are developing a
or application that will require the use of a link, socket, port
protocol, or network number please contact Joyce to receive a
assignment
Joyce
USC - Information Sciences
4676 Admiralty
Marina del Rey, California 90292
phone: (213) 822-1511
ARPA mail: JKREYNOLDS@USC-
Most of the protocols mentioned here are documented in the RFC series
notes. The more prominent and more generally used are documented in
"Internet Protocol Transition Workbook" [16] or in the old "
Protocol Handbook" [17] prepared by the NIC. Some of the items
are undocumented. Further information on protocols can be found in
memo "Official Protocols" [52].
In all cases the name and mailbox of the responsible individual
indicated. In the lists that follow, a bracketed entry, e.g., [16,iii],
at the right hand margin of the page indicates a reference for
listed protocol, where the number cites the document and the "iii"
the person
Reynolds & Postel [Page 1]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Network
ASSIGNED NETWORK
The network numbers listed here are used as internet addresses by
Internet Protocol (IP) [16,47]. The IP uses a 32-bit address
and divides that address into a network part and a "rest" or
address part. The division takes 3 forms or classes
The first type of address, or class A, has a 7-bit network
and a 24-bit local address. The highest-order bit is set to 0.
This allows 128 class A networks
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0| NETWORK | Local Address |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Class A
The second type of address, class B, has a 14-bit network
and a 16-bit local address. The two highest-order bits are set
1-0. This allows 16,384 class B networks
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|1 0| NETWORK | Local Address |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Class B
The third type of address, class C, has a 21-bit network
and a 8-bit local address. The three highest-order bits are
to 1-1-0. This allows 2,097,152 class C networks
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|1 1 0| NETWORK | Local Address |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Class C
Note: No addresses are allowed with the three highest-order
set to 1-1-1. These addresses (sometimes called "class D")
reserved
Reynolds & Postel [Page 2]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Network
One commonly used notation for internet host addresses divides
32-bit address into four 8-bit fields and specifies the value of
field as a decimal number with the fields separated by periods.
is called the "dotted decimal" notation. For example, the
address of ISIF in dotted decimal is 010.002.000.052, or 10.2.0.52.
The dotted decimal notation will be used in the listing of
network numbers. The class A networks will have nnn.rrr.rrr.rrr,
class B networks will have nnn.nnn.rrr.rrr, and the class C
will have nnn.nnn.nnn.rrr, where nnn represents part or all of
network number and rrr represents part or all of a local address
There are three catagories of users of Internet Addresses: Research
Defense, and Commercial. To reflect the allocation of
identifiers among the categories, a one-character code is placed
the left of the network number (in the column marked by an asterisk):
R for Research and Development, D for DoD, and C for Commercial
Numbers assigned for commercial use of IP family protocols, but
for interworking with the ARPA or DoD Internets are marked with
astrisk preceeding the number
For various reasons, the assigned numbers of networks are
changed. To ease the transition the old number will be listed
well. These "old number" entries will be marked with a "T"
the number and preceeding the name, and the network name will be
suffixed "-TEMP".
Reynolds & Postel [Page 3]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Network
Assigned Network
Class A
* Internet Address Name Network
- ---------------- ---- ------- ----------
000.rrr.rrr.rrr Reserved [JBP
R 003.rrr.rrr.rrr T RCC-NET-TEMP BBN RCC Network [SGC
R 004.rrr.rrr.rrr SATNET Atlantic Satellite Network[DM11]
D 005.rrr.rrr.rrr T DEMO-PR-1-TEMPDemo-1 Packet Radio Network[LCS
D 006.rrr.rrr.rrr T YPG-NET-TEMP Yuma Proving Grounds [2,BXA
D 007.rrr.rrr.rrr T EDN-TEMP DCEC EDN [EC5]
R 008.rrr.rrr.rrr T BBN-NET-TEMP BBN Network [JSG5]
D 009.rrr.rrr.rrr T BRAGG-PR-TEMP Ft. Bragg Packet Radio Net [JEM
R 010.rrr.rrr.rrr ARPANET ARPANET [2,17,REK2]
C 012.rrr.rrr.rrr ATT ATT, Bell Labs [MH12]
C 014.rrr.rrr.rrr PDN Public Data Network [REK2]
R 018.rrr.rrr.rrr T MIT-TEMP MIT Network [11,51,DDC2]
R 023.rrr.rrr.rrr MITRE MITRE Cablenet [54,APS
D 024.rrr.rrr.rrr MINET MINET [2,DHH
R 025.rrr.rrr.rrr RSRE-EXP RSRE Experimental [NM
D 026.rrr.rrr.rrr MILNET MILNET [HH6]
R 027.rrr.rrr.rrr T NOSC-LCCN-TEMPNOSC / LCCN [RH6]
R 028.rrr.rrr.rrr WIDEBAND Wide Band Satellite Net [CJW2]
R 032.rrr.rrr.rrr UCL-TAC UCL TAC [PK
R 035.rrr.rrr.rrr T RSRE-NULL-TEMPRSRE Null Network [NM
R 036.rrr.rrr.rrr T SU-NET-TEMP Stanford University Network[JCM
R 039.rrr.rrr.rrr T SRINET-TEMP SRI Local Network [GEOF
R 041.rrr.rrr.rrr BBN-TEST-A BBN-GATE-TEST-A [RH6]
R 044.rrr.rrr.rrr AMPRNET Amateur Radio Experiment Net[HM
R 045.rrr.rrr.rrr T C3-PR-TEMP Testbed Development PRNET [BG5]
R 046.rrr.rrr.rrr T Berkeley-TEMP Berkeley Ethernet [DAM1]
R 047.rrr.rrr.rrr T SAC-PR-TEMP SAC Packet Radio Network [BG5]
R 048.rrr.rrr.rrr NDRE-TIU NDRE-TIU [PS3]
R 050.rrr.rrr.rrr NTA-RING NDRE-RING [PS3]
001.rrr.rrr.rrr-002.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
011.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
013.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
015.rrr.rrr.rrr-017.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
019.rrr.rrr.rrr-022.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
029.rrr.rrr.rrr-031.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
033.rrr.rrr.rrr-034.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
037.rrr.rrr.rrr-038.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
040.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
042.rrr.rrr.rrr-043.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
049.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
051.rrr.rrr.rrr-126.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
127.rrr.rrr.rrr Reserved [JBP
Reynolds & Postel [Page 4]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Network
Class B
* Internet Address Name Network
- ---------------- ---- ------- ----------
128.000.rrr.rrr Reserved [JBP
R 128.001.rrr.rrr BBN-TEST-B BBN-GATE-TEST-B [RH6]
R 128.002.rrr.rrr CMU-NET CMU-Ethernet [HDW2]
R 128.003.rrr.rrr LBL-CSAM LBL-CSAM-RESEARCH [MO1]<--***
R 128.004.rrr.rrr DCNET LINKABIT DCNET [DLM1]
R 128.005.rrr.rrr FORDNET FORD DCNET [DLM1]
R 128.006.rrr.rrr RUTGERS RUTGERS [CLH3]
R 128.007.rrr.rrr DFVLR DFVLR DCNET Network [HDC1]
R 128.008.rrr.rrr UMDNET Univ of Maryland DCNET [DLM1]
R 128.009.rrr.rrr ISI-NET USC-ISI Local Network [CMR
R 128.010.rrr.rrr PURDUE-CS Purdue Computer Science [CAK
R 128.011.rrr.rrr BBN-CRONUS BBN DOS Project [29,WIM
R 128.012.rrr.rrr SU-NET Stanford University Net [JCM
D 128.013.rrr.rrr MATNET Mobile Access Terminal Net[DM11]
R 128.014.rrr.rrr BBN-SAT-TEST BBN SATNET Test Net [DM11]
R 128.015.rrr.rrr S1NET LLL-S1-NET [EAK1]
R 128.016.rrr.rrr UCLNET University College London [PK
D 128.017.rrr.rrr MATNET-ALT Mobile Access Terminal Alt[DM11]
R 128.018.rrr.rrr SRINET SRI Local Network [GEOF
D 128.019.rrr.rrr EDN DCEC EDN [EC5]
D 128.020.rrr.rrr BRLNET BRLNET [2,MJM2]
R 128.021.rrr.rrr SF-PR-1 SF-1 Packet Radio Network [JEM
R 128.022.rrr.rrr SF-PR-2 SF-2 Packet Radio Network [JEM
R 128.023.rrr.rrr BBN-PR BBN Packet Radio Network [JAW3]
R 128.024.rrr.rrr ROCKWELL-PR Rockwell Packet Radio Net [EHP
D 128.025.rrr.rrr BRAGG-PR Ft. Bragg Packet Radio Net [JEM
D 128.026.rrr.rrr SAC-PR SAC Packet Radio Network [BG5]
D 128.027.rrr.rrr DEMO-PR-1 Demo-1 Packet Radio Network[LCS
D 128.028.rrr.rrr C3-PR Testbed Development PR NET [BG5]
128.029.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
R 128.030.rrr.rrr MIT-NET MIT Local Network [DDC2]
R 128.031.rrr.rrr MIT-RES MIT Research Network [DDC2]
R 128.032.rrr.rrr UCB-ETHER UC Berkeley Ethernet [DAM1]
R 128.033.rrr.rrr BBN-NET BBN Network [JSG5]
R 128.034.rrr.rrr NOSC-LCCN NOSC / LCCN [RH6]
R 128.035.rrr.rrr CISLTESTNET1 Honeywell [25,26,RK1]
R 128.036.rrr.rrr YALE-NET YALE NET [61,JO5]
D 128.037.rrr.rrr YPG-NET Yuma Proving Grounds [2,BXA
D 128.038.rrr.rrr NSWC-NET NSWC Local Host Net [RLH2]
128.039.rrr.rrr-191.254.rrr.rrr Unassigned [JBP
191.255.rrr.rrr Reserved [JBP
Reynolds & Postel [Page 5]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Network
Class C
* Internet Address Name Network
- ---------------- ---- ------- ----------
192.000.000.rrr Reserved [JBP
R 192.000.001.rrr BBN-TEST-C BBN-GATE-TEST-C [RH6]
192.000.002.rrr-192.000.255.rrr Unassigned [JBP
R 192.001.000.rrr-192.004.255.rrr BBN local networks [SGC
R 192.005.001.rrr CISLHYPERNET Honeywell [RK1]
R 192.005.002.rrr WISC Univ of Wisconsin Madison [RS23]
C 192.005.003.rrr HP-DESIGN-AIDS HP Design Aids [NXK
C 192.005.004.rrr HP-TCG-UNIX Hewlett Packard TCG Unix [NXK
192.005.005.rrr Unassigned [JBP
192.005.006.rrr Unassigned [JBP
R 192.005.007.rrr CIT-CS-NET Caltech-CS-Net [60,DSW
R 192.005.008.rrr WASHINGTON University of Washington [JAR4]
R 192.005.009.rrr AERONET Aerospace Labnet [1,LCN
R 192.005.010.rrr ECLNET USC-ECL-CAMPUS-NET [MXB
R 192.005.011.rrr CSS-RING SEISMIC-RESEARCH-NET [RR2]
R 192.005.012.rrr UTAH-NET UTAH-COMPUTER-SCIENCE-NET [RF1]
R 192.005.013.rrr CCNET Compion Network [61,FAS
R 192.005.014.rrr RAND-NET RAND Network [61,JDG
R 192.005.015.rrr NYU-NET NYU Network [EF5]
R 192.005.016.rrr LANL-LAND Los Alamos Dev LAN [61,JC11]
R 192.005.017.rrr NRL-NET Naval Research Lab [AP
R 192.005.018.rrr IPTO-NET ARPA-IPTO Office Net [REK2]
R 192.005.019.rrr UCIICS UCI-ICS Res Net [MXR
R 192.005.020.rrr CISLTTYNET Honeywell [RK1]
D 192.005.021.rrr BRLNET1 BRLNET1 [2,MJM2]
D 192.005.022.rrr BRLNET2 BRLNET2 [2,MJM2]
D 192.005.023.rrr BRLNET3 BRLNET3 [2,MJM2]
D 192.005.024.rrr BRLNET4 BRLNET4 [2,MJM2]
D 192.005.025.rrr BRLNET5 BRLNET5 [2,MJM2]
D 192.005.026.rrr NSRDCOA-NET NSRDC Office Auto Net [TC4]
D 192.005.027.rrr DTNSRDC-NET DTNSRDC-NET [TC4]
R 192.005.028.rrr RSRE-NULL RSRE-NULL [NM
R 192.005.029.rrr RSRE-ACC RSRE-ACC [NM
R 192.005.030.rrr RSRE-PR RSRE-PR [NM
R 192.005.031.rrr SIEMENS-NET Siemens Research Network [PXN
R 192.005.032.rrr CISLTESTNET2 Honeywell [25,26,RK1]
R 192.005.033.rrr CISLTESTNET3 Honeywell [25,26,RK1]
R 192.005.034.rrr CISLTESTNET4 Honeywell [25,26,RK1]
R 192.005.035.rrr RIACS USRA [61,RLB1]
R 192.005.036.rrr CORNELL-CS CORNELL CS Research [61,DK2]
R 192.005.037.rrr UR-CS-NET U of R CS 3Mb Net [31,LB1]
R 192.005.038.rrr SRI-C3ETHER SRI-AITAD C3ETHERNET [61,BG5]
R 192.005.039.rrr UDEL-EECIS Udel EECIS LAN [58,CC2]
R 192.005.040.rrr PUCC-NET-A PURDUE Comp Cntr Net [JXS
Reynolds & Postel [Page 6]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Network
D 192.005.041.rrr WISLAN WIS Research LAN [54,JRM1]
D 192.005.042.rrr AFDSC-HYPER AFDSC Hypernet [MCSJ
R 192.005.043.rrr CUCSNET Columbia CS Net [61,LH2]
192.005.044.rrr-192.005.255.rrr Unassigned [JBP
C*192.006.000.rrr-192.006.255.rrr Hewlett Packard [AXG
C*192.007.000.rrr-192.007.255.rrr Computer Consoles, Inc. [RA11]
C*192.008.000.rrr-192.008.255.rrr Spartacus Computers, Inc. [SXM
192.009.000.rrr-223.255.254.rrr Unassigned [JBP
223.255.255.rrr Reserved [JBP
Other Reserved Internet
* Internet Address Name Network
- ---------------- ---- ------- ----------
224.000.000.000-255.255.255.255 Reserved [JBP
Reynolds & Postel [Page 7]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Network
Network
Assigned for the
Class A B C
Research 10 27 1055 1092
Defense 2 10 9 21
Commercial 2 0 2 4
Total 14 37 1066 1117
Allocated for Internet and Other
Class A B C
Research 10 27 1055 1092
Defense 2 10 9 21
Commercial 2 0 770 772
Total 14 37 1834 1885
Maximum
Class A B C
Research 8 1024 65536 66568
Defense 24 3072 458752 461848
Commercial 94 12286 1572862 1585242
Total 126 16382 2097150 2113658
Reynolds & Postel [Page 8]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Internet Version
ASSIGNED INTERNET VERSION
In the Internet Protocol (IP) [16,47] there is a field to
the version of the internetwork general protocol. This field is 4
bits in size
Assigned Internet Version
Decimal Octal Version
------- ----- ------- ----------
0 0 Reserved [JBP
1-3 1-3 Unassigned [JBP
4 4 Internet Protocol [16,47,JBP
5 5 ST Datagram Mode [18,JWF
6-14 6-16 Unassigned [JBP
15 17 Reserved [JBP
ASSIGNED INTERNET PROTOCOL
In the Internet Protocol (IP) [16,47] there is a field,
Protocol, to identify the the next level protocol. This is an 8
field
Assigned Internet Protocol
Decimal Octal Protocol
------- ----- ---------------- ----------
0 0 Reserved [JBP
1 1 ICMP [16,40,JBP
2 2 Unassigned [JBP
3 3 Gateway-to-Gateway [24,MB
4 4 Unassigned [JBP
5 5 Stream (ST) [18,JWF
6 6 Transmission Control (TCP) [16,48,JBP
7 7 UCL [PK
8 10 Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) [53,RH6]
9 11 Unassigned [JBP
10 12 BBN RCC Monitoring [SGC
11 13 NVP [12,SC3]
12 14 PUP [6,EAT3]
13-14 15-16 Unassigned [JBP
15 17 Cross Net Debugger (XNET) [23,JFH2]
16 20 Chaos Stream [NC3]
17 21 User Datagram (UDP) [16,46,JBP
18 22 Multiplexing [13,JBP
19 23 DCN Measurement Subsystems [DLM1]
20 24 Host Monitoring (HMP) [28,RH6]
21 25 Packet Radio Measurement [ZSU
Reynolds & Postel [Page 9]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Internet Protocol
22 26 XEROX NS IDP [62,LLG
23 27 Trunk-1 [BML
24 30 Trunk-2 [BML
25 31 Leaf-1 [BML
26 32 Leaf-2 [BML
27-60 33-74 Unassigned [JBP
61 75 any host internal protocol [JBP
62 76 CFTP [19,HCF2]
63 77 any local network [JBP
64 100 SATNET and Backroom EXPAK [DM11]
65 101 MIT Subnet Support [NC3]
66 102 MIT VAX Remote Disk Protocol [MBG
67 103 Internet Pluribus Packet Core [DM11]
68 104 Unassigned [JBP
69 105 SATNET Monitoring [DM11]
70 106 Unassigned [JBP
71 107 Internet Packet Core Utility [DM11]
72-75 110-113 Unassigned [JBP
76 114 Backroom SATNET Monitoring [DM11]
77 115 Unassigned [JBP
78 116 WIDEBAND Monitoring [DM11]
79 117 WIDEBAND EXPAK [DM11]
80-254 120-376 Unassigned [JBP
255 377 Reserved [JBP
Reynolds & Postel [Page 10]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Port
ASSIGNED PORT
Ports are used in the TCP [16,48] to name the ends of
connections which carry long term conversations. For the purpose
providing services to unknown callers, a service contact port
defined. This list specifies the port used by the server process
its contact port. The contact port is sometimes called
"well-known port".
To the extent possible, these same port assignments are used with
UDP [16,46].
The assigned ports use a small portion of the possible port numbers
The assigned ports have all except the low order eight bits
to zero. The low order eight bits are specified here
Port Assignments
Decimal Octal Description
------- ----- ----------- ----------
0 0 Reserved [JBP
1-4 1-4 Unassigned [JBP
5 5 Remote Job Entry [8,17,JBP
7 7 Echo [38,JBP
9 11 Discard [37,JBP
11 13 Active Users [34,JBP
13 15 Daytime [36,JBP
15 17 Who is up or NETSTAT [JBP
17 21 Quote of the Day [43,JBP
19 23 Character Generator [35,JBP
20 24 File Transfer (Default Data) [16,39,JBP
21 25 File Transfer (Control) [16,39,JBP
23 27 Telnet [50,JBP
25 31 SMTP [16,45,JBP
27 33 NSW User System FE [14,RHT
29 35 MSG ICP [32,RHT
31 37 MSG Authentication [32,RHT
33 41 Unassigned [JBP
35 43 Any Printer Server [JBP
37 45 Time [49,JBP
39 47 Unassigned [JBP
41 51 Graphics [17,57,JBP
42 52 Host Name Server [16,42,JBP
43 53 NICNAME (WhoIs) [16,22,JAKE
44 54 MPM FLAGS Protocol [JBP
45 55 Message Processing Module (receive) [41,JBP
46 56 MPM (default send) [41,JBP
47 57 NI FTP [59,SK
Reynolds & Postel [Page 11]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Port
49 61 Login Host Protocol [PXD
51 63 IMP Logical Address Maintenance [30,AGM
53 65 Domain Name Server [PM1]
55 67 ISI Graphics Language [5,RB6]
57 71 Any Private Terminal Access [JBP
59 73 Any Private File Service [JBP
61 75 NIMAIL [3,SK
63 77 Unassigned [JBP
65 101 Unassigned [JBP
67 103 Datacomputer at CCA [10,JZS
69 105 Trivial File Transfer [16,55,KRS
71 107 NETRJS [7,17,RTB
72 110 NETRJS [7,17,RTB
73 111 NETRJS [7,17,RTB
74 112 NETRJS [7,17,RTB
75 113 Any Private Dial Out Service [JBP
77 115 Any Private RJE Service [JBP
79 117 Finger (Name) [17,20,KLH
81 121 HOSTS2 Name Server [EAK1]
83 123 MIT ML Device [DPR
85 125 MIT ML Device [DPR
87 127 any terminal link [JBP
89 131 SU/MIT Telnet Gateway [MRC
91 133 MIT Dover Spooler [EBM
93 135 Device Control Protocol [DCT
95 137 SUPDUP [15,MRC
97 141 Datacomputer Status [10,JZS
99 143 Metagram Relay [GEOF
101 145 NIC Host Name Server [16,21,JAKE
103 147 Unassigned [JBP
105 151 CSNET Mailbox Name Server (Program) [56,MHS1]
107 153 Remote Telnet Service [44,JBP
109-129 155-201 Unassigned [JBP
131 203 Datacomputer [10,JZS
132-223 204-337 Reserved [JBP
224-241 340-361 Unassigned [JBP
243 363 Survey Measurement [4,AV
245 365 LINK [9,RDB2]
247-255 367-377 Unassigned [JBP
Reynolds & Postel [Page 12]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Autonomous System
ASSIGNED AUTONOMOUS SYSTEM
The Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) [53] specifies that groups
gateways may form autonomous systems. The EGP provides a 16-
field for identifying such systems. The values of this field
registered here
Autonomous System Numbers
Decimal Description
------- ----------- ----------
0 Reserved [JBP
1 The BBN Gateways [MB
2 The DCN Gateways [DLM1]
3 The MIT Gateways [LM8]
4-65534 Unassigned [JBP
65535 Reserved [JBP
Reynolds & Postel [Page 13]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
ARPANET Link
ASSIGNED ARPANET LINK
The word "link" here refers to a field in the original
Host/IMP interface leader. The link was originally defined as
8-bit field. Later specifications defined this field as
"Message-ID" with a length of 12 bits. The name link now refers
the high order 8 bits of this 12-bit message-id field. The low
4 bits of the message-id field are to be zero unless
specified otherwise for the particular protocol used on that link
The Host/IMP interface is defined in BBN Report 1822 [2].
Link Assignments
Decimal Octal Description
------- ----- ----------- ----------
0 0 Reserved [JBP
1-149 1-225 Unassigned [JBP
150 226 Xerox NS IP [62,LLG
151 227 Unassigned [JBP
152 230 PARC Universal Protocol [6,EAT3]
153 231 TIP Status Reporting [JGH
154 232 TIP Accounting [JGH
155 233 Internet Protocol (regular) [16,47,JBP
156-158 234-236 Internet Protocol (experimental) [16,47,JBP
159-195 237-303 Unassigned [JBP
196-255 304-377 Experimental Protocols [JBP
248-255 370-377 Network Maintenance [JGH
ETHERNET NUMBERS OF
Many of the networks of all classes are Ethernets (10Mb)
Experimental Ethernets (3Mb). These systems use a message "type
field in much the same way the ARPANET uses the "link" field
Assignments
Ethernet Exp. Ethernet Description
-------------- -------------- ----------- ----------
decimal Hex decimal
512 02,00 512 1000 XEROX PUP [6,EAT3]
1536 06,00 1536 3000 XEROX NS IDP [62,LLG
2048 08,00 513 1001 DOD IP [16,47,JBP
2054 08,06 - - Address Res [33,DCP1]
Reynolds & Postel [Page 14]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
Public Data Network
ASSIGNED PUBLIC DATA NETWORK
One of the Internet Class A Networks is the international system
Public Data Networks. This section lists the mapping between
Internet Addresses and the Public Data Network Addresses (X.121).
Assignments
Internet Public Data Net Description
--------------- ----------------- ----------- ----------
014.000.000.000 Reserved [JBP
014.000.000.001 3110-317-00035 00 PURDUE-TN [CAK
014.000.000.002 3110-608-00027 00 UWISC-TN [CAK
014.000.000.003 3110-302-00024 00 UDEL-TN [CAK
014.000.000.004 2342-192-00149 23 UCL-VTEST [PK
014.000.000.005 2342-192-00300 23 UCL-TG [PK
014.000.000.006 2342-192-00300 25 UK-SATNET [PK
014.000.000.007 3110-608-00024 00 UWISC-IBM [MHS1]
014.000.000.008 3110-213-00045 00 RAND-TN [MO2]
014.000.000.009 2342-192-00300 23 UCL-CS [PK
014.000.000.010 3110-617-00025 00 BBN-VAN-GW [JD21]
014.000.000.011-014.255.255.254 Unassigned [JBP
014.255.255.255 Reserved [JBP
The standard for transmission of IP datagrams over the Public
Network is specified in [27].
Reynolds & Postel [Page 15]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
---------
[1] Aerospace, Internal Report, ATM-83(3920-01)-3, 1982.
[2] BBN, "Specifications for the Interconnection of a Host and
IMP", Report 1822, Bolt Beranek and Newman, Cambridge
Massachusetts, revised, December 1981.
[3] Bennett, C., "A Simple NIFTP-Based Mail System", IEN 169,
University College, London, January 1981.
[4] Bhushan, A., "A Report on the Survey Project", RFC 530,
NIC 17375, 22 June 1973.
[5] Bisbey, R., D. Hollingworth, and B. Britt, "Graphics
(version 2.1)", ISI/TM-80-18, USC/Information
Institute, July 1980.
[6] Boggs, D., J. Shoch, E. Taft, and R. Metcalfe, "PUP:
Internetwork Architecture", XEROX Palo Alto Research Center
CSL-79-10, July 1979; also in IEEE Transactions
Communication, Volume COM-28, Number 4, April 1980.
[7] Braden, R., "NETRJS Protocol", RFC 740, NIC 42423,
22 November 1977. Also in [17].
[8] Bressler, B., "Remote Job Entry Protocol", RFC 407,
12112, 16 October 72. Also in [17].
[9] Bressler, R., "Inter-Entity Communication -- An Experiment",
RFC 441, NIC 13773, 19 January 1973.
[10] CCA, "Datacomputer Version 5/4 User Manual",
Corporation of America, August 1979.
[11] Clark, D., "Revision of DSP Specification", Local
Note 9, Laboratory for Computer Science, MIT, 17 June 1977.
[12] Cohen, D., "Specifications for the Network Voice Protocol",
RFC 741, ISI/RR 7539, USC/Information Sciences Institute
March 1976.
[13] Cohen, D. and J. Postel, "Multiplexing Protocol", IEN 90,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, May 1979.
Reynolds & Postel [Page 16]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
[14] COMPASS, "Semi-Annual Technical Report", CADD-7603-0411,
Massachusetts Computer Associates, 4 March 1976. Also as
"National Software Works, Status Report No. 1,"
RADC-TR-76-276, Volume 1, September 1976. And COMPASS. "
Semi-Annual Report," CADD-7608-1611, Massachusetts
Associates, 16 August 1976.
[15] Crispin, M., "SUPDUP Protocol", RFC 734, NIC 41953,
7 October 1977. Also in [17].
[16] Feinler, E., "Internet Protocol Transition Workbook",
Information Center, SRI International, March 1982.
[17] Feinler, E. and J. Postel, eds., "ARPANET Protocol Handbook",
NIC 7104, for the Defense Communications Agency by
International, Menlo Park, California, Revised January 1978.
[18] Forgie, J., "ST - A Proposed Internet Stream Protocol",
IEN 119, M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory, September 1979.
[19] Forsdick, H., "CFTP", Network Message, Bolt Berenak
Newman, January 1982.
[20] Harrenstien, K., "Name/Finger", RFC 742, NIC 42758,
30 December 1977. Also in [17].
[21] Harrenstien, K., V. White, and E. Feinler, "Hostnames Server",
RFC 811, SRI International, March 1982.
[22] Harrenstien, K., and V. White, "Nicname/Whois", RFC 812,
International, March 1982.
[23] Haverty, J., "XNET Formats for Internet Protocol Version 4",
IEN 158, October 1980.
[24] Hinden, R., A. Sheltzer, "The DARPA Internet Gateway",
RFC 823, September 1982.
[25] Honeywell CISL, Internal Document, "AFSDSC Hyperchannel
Project Plan".
[26] Honeywell CISL, Internal Document, "Multics MR11 PFS".
[27] Korb, John T., "A Standard for the Transmission of
Datagrams Over Public Data Networks", RFC 877,
University, September 1983.
Reynolds & Postel [Page 17]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
[28] Littauer, B., "A Host Monitoring Protocol", IEN 197,
Berenak and Newman, September 1981.
[29] Macgregor, W., and D. Tappan, "The CRONUS Virtual
Network", RFC 824, Bolt Beranek and Newman, 22 August 1982.
[30] Malis, A., "Logical Addressing Implementation Specification",
BBN Report 5256, pp 31-36, May 1983.
[31] Metcalfe, R.M. and D.R. Boggs, "Ethernet: Distributed
Switching for Local Computer Networks", Communications of
ACM, 19 (7), pp 395-402, July 1976.
[32] NSW Protocol Committee, "MSG: The Interprocess
Facility for the National Software Works", CADD-7612-2411,
Massachusetts Computer Associates, BBN 3237, Bolt Beranek
Newman, Revised 24 December 1976.
[33] Plummer, D., "An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol
Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48-bit
Addresses for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware", RFC 826,
LCS, November 1982.
[34] Postel, J., "Active Users", RFC 866, USC/Information
Institute, May 1983.
[35] Postel, J., "Character Generator Protocol", RFC 864,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
[36] Postel, J., "Daytime Protocol", RFC 867, USC/
Sciences Institute, May 1983.
[37] Postel, J., "Discard Protocol", RFC 863, USC/
Sciences Institute, May 1983.
[38] Postel, J., "Echo Protocol", RFC 862, USC/Information
Institute, May 1983.
[39] Postel, J., "File Transfer Protocol", RFC 765, IEN 149,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, June 1980.
[40] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol -
Internet Program Protocol Specification", RFC 792,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.
[41] Postel, J., "Internet Message Protocol", RFC 759, IEN 113,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1980.
Reynolds & Postel [Page 18]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
[42] Postel, J., "Name Server", IEN 116, USC/Information
Institute, August 1979.
[43] Postel, J., "Quote of the Day Protocol", RFC 865,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
[44] Postel, J., "Remote Telnet Service", RFC 818, USC/
Sciences Institute, November 1982.
[45] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 821,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.
[46] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", RFC 768 USC/
Sciences Institute, August 1980.
[47] Postel, J., ed., "Internet Protocol - DARPA Internet
Protocol Specification", RFC 791, USC/Information
Institute, September 1981.
[48] Postel, J., ed., "Transmission Control Protocol -
Internet Program Protocol Specification", RFC 793,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.
[49] Postel, J., and K. Harrenstien, "Time Protocol", RFC 868,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
[50] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Protocol Specification",
RFC 854, USC/Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
[51] Reed, D., "Protocols for the LCS Network", Local Network
3, Laboratory for Computer Science, MIT, 29 November 1976.
[52] Reynolds, J. and J. Postel, "Official Protocols", RFC 880,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1983.
[53] Rosen, E., "Exterior Gateway Protocol" RFC 827, Bolt
and Newman, October 1982.
[54] Skelton, A., S. Holmgren, and D. Wood, "The MITRE
Project", IEN 96, April 1979.
[55] Sollins, K., "The TFTP Protocol (Revision 2)", RFC 783,
MIT/LCS, June 1981.
[56] Solomon, M., L. Landweber, and D, Neuhengen, "The CSNET
Server", Computer Networks, v.6, n.3, pp. 161-172, July 1982.
Reynolds & Postel [Page 19]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
[57] Sproull, R., and E. Thomas, "A Networks Graphics Protocol",
NIC 24308, 16 August 1974. Also in [17].
[58] "The Ethernet - A Local Area Network", Version 1.0,
Equipment Corporation, Intel Corporation, Xerox Corporation
September 1980.
[59] The High Level Protocol Group, "A Network Independent
Transfer Protocol", INWG Protocol Note 86, December 1977.
[60] Whelan, D., "The Caltech Computer Science Department Network",
5052:DF:82, Caltech Computer Science Department, 1982.
[61] XEROX, "The Ethernet, A Local Area Network: Data Link
and Physical Layer Specification", X3T51/80-50,
Corporation, Stamford, CT., October 1980.
[62] XEROX, "Internet Transport Protocols", XSIS 028112,
Corporation, Stamford, Connecticut, December 1981.
Reynolds & Postel [Page 20]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
------
[AGM] Andy Malis BBN Malis@BBN-
[APS] Anita Skelton MITRE skelton@
[AP] Alan Parker NRL parker@NRL-
[AV] Al Vezza MIT AV@MIT-
[AXG] Atul Garg HP ---none---
[BG5] Bob Gilligan SRI Gilligan@SRI-
[BML] Barry Leiner ARPA Leiner@USC-
[BXA] Bobby W. Allen YPG WYMER@
[CAK] Chris Kent PURDUE cak@
[CC2] Chase Cotton UDEL Cotton@Udel-
[CJW2] Cliff Weinstein LL cjw@LL-11
[CLH3] Charles Hedrick RUTGERS Hedrick@
[CMR] Craig Rogers ISI Rogers@USC-
[DAM1] David A. Mosher UCB Mosher@
[DCP1] David Plummer MIT DCP@MIT-
[DCT] Dan Tappan BBN Tappan@
[DDC2] Dave Clark MIT-LCS Clark@MIT-
[DHH] Doug Hunt BBN DHunt@BBN-
[DK2] Dean B. Krafft CORNELL Dean@
[DLM1] David Mills LINKABIT Mills@USC-
[DM11] Dale McNeill BBN mcneill@BBN-
[DPR] David Reed MIT-LCS DPR@MIT-
[DSW] Dan Whelan Caltech Dan@CIT-20
[EAK1] Earl Killian LLL EAK@MIT-
[EAT3] Ed Taft XEROX Taft.PA@PARC-
[EBM] Eliot Moss MIT EBM@MIT-
[EC5] Ed Cain DCEC cain@EDN-
[EF5] Ed Franceschini NYU Franceschini@
[EHP] Ed Perry SRI Perry@SRI-
[FAS] Fred Segovich Compion fred@COMPION-
[GEOF] Geoff Goodfellow SRI Geoff@DARCOM-
[HCF2] Harry Forsdick BBN Forsdick@
[HDC1] Horst Clausen DFVLR Clausen@USC-
[HDW2] Howard Wactlar CMU Wactlar@CMU-10
[HH6] Heidi Heiden DCA Heiden@
[HM] Hank Magnuski --- JOSE@PARC-
[JAKE] Jake Feinler SRI Feinler@SRI-
[JAR4] Jim Rees WASHINGTON JIM@
[JAW3] Jil Westcott BBN Westcott@
[JBP] Jon Postel ISI Postel@USC-
[JC11] Jim Clifford LANL jrc@
[JCM] Jeff Mogul STANFORD Mogul@SU-
[JD21] Jonathan Dreyer BBN JDreyer@BBN-
[JDG] Jim Guyton RAND guyton@RAND-
[JEM] Jim Mathis SRI Mathis@SRI-
[JFH2] Jack Haverty BBN Haverty@BBN-
Reynolds & Postel [Page 21]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
[JGH] Jim Herman BBN Herman@BBN-
[JO5] John O'Donnell YALE ODonnell@
[JRM1] John Mullen MITRE Mullen@
[JSG5] Jon Goodridge BBN jsg@BBN-
[JWF] Jim Forgie LL Forgie@
[JXS] Jeffrey R. Schwab PURDUE jrs@
[JZS] Joanne Sattely CCA JZS@
[KLH] Ken Harrenstien SRI KLH@
[KRS] Karen Sollins MIT Sollins@MIT-
[LB1] Liudvikas Bukys ROCHESTER Bukys@
[LCN] Lou Nelson AEROSPACE Lou@
[LCS] Lou Schreier SRI Schreier@USC-
[LH2] Lincoln Hu COLUMBIA Hu@Columbia-20
[LLG] Larry Garlick XEROX Garlick@PARC-
[LM8] Liza Martin MIT-LCS Martin@MIT-
[MBG] Michael Greenwald MIT-LCS Greenwald@MIT-
[MB] Michael Brescia BBN Brescia@BBN-
[MCSJ] Mike StJohns AFDSC StJohns@MIT-
[MH12] Mark Horton ATT mark@
[MHS1] Marvin Solomon WISC Solomon@
[MJM2] Mike Muuss BRL Mike@
[MO2] Michael O'Brien RAND OBrien@RAND-
[MRC] Mark Crispin Stanford Admin.MRC@SU-
[MXB] Mark Brown USC Mark@USC-
[MXR] Marshall Rose Irvine MRose.UCI@RAND-
[NC3] J. Noel Chiappa MIT JNC@MIT-
[NM] Neil MacKenzie RSRE T45@USC-
[NXK] Neil Katin HP hpda.neil@
[PK] Peter Kirstein UCL Kirstein@USC-
[PM1] Paul Mockapetris ISI Mockapetris@USC-
[PS3] Paal Spilling NDRE Paal@DARCOM-
[PXD] Pieter Ditmars BBN pditmars@BBN-
[PXN] Peter Nellessen SIEMENS crtvax!pn@CMU-CS-
[RA11] Rick Adams CCI rlgvax!ra@
[RB6] Richard Bisbey ISI Bisbey@USC-
[RDB2] Robert Bressler BBN Bressler@BBN-
[REK2] Robert Kahn ARPA Kahn@USC-
[RF1] Randy Frank UTAH Frank@UTAH-20
[RH6] Robert Hinden BBN Hinden@BBN-
[RHT] Robert Thomas BBN BThomas@
[RK1] Richard Kovalcik Honeywell Kovalcik@MIT-
[RLB1] Bob Brown USRA rlb@ames-
[RLH2] Ronald L. Hartung NSWC ron@nswc-
[RR2] Raleigh Romine Teledyne romine@
[RS23] Russel Sandberg WISC root@
[RTB] Bob Braden UCLA Braden@USC-
[SC3] Steve Casner ISI Casner@USC-
[SGC] Steve Chipman BBN Chipman@
Reynolds & Postel [Page 22]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
[SK] Steve Kille UCL UKSAT@USC-
[SXM] Scott Marcus Spartacus ---none---
[TC4] Tony Cincotta DTNSRDC tony@
[WIM] William Macgregor BBN macg@
[ZSU] Zaw-Sing Su SRI ZSu@SRI-
Reynolds & Postel [Page 23]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
----------
This appendix summarizes the agreements reached by the DDN/PMO
DARPA at a September 1982 meeting concerning the allocation
assignment of the various numbers associated with DoD
Standards and the DARPA Experimental Standards
Recommended policy is summarized for each type of number
of concern
Network Identifiers used by the Internet
It is recommended that the available number spaces for class A
B, and C network addresses be allocated among R&D, DoD
commercial uses, and that assignments of these addresses be
responsibility respectively of DARPA, DCA PCCO/DDN and
National Bureau of Standards. The recommended allocations
given below
Class A (highest-order bit 0)
R&D allocation: 8
DoD allocation: 24
Commercial allocation: 94
Reserved Addresses: 0,127
Class B (highest-order bits 1-0)
R&D allocation: 1024
DoD allocation: 3072
Commercial allocation: 12286
Reserved Addresses: 0,16383
Class C (highest-order bits 1-1-0)
R&D allocation: 65536
DoD allocation: 458725
Commercial allocation: 1572862
Reserved Addresses: 0,2097151
Class D (highest-order bits 1-1-1)
All addresses in this class are reserved for future use
possibly in support of multicast services. They should
allocated to R&D use for the present
Reynolds & Postel [Page 24]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
APPENDIX
Within the R&D community, it will be the policy that
identifiers will only be granted to applicants who
evidence that they are acquiring standard Bolt Beranek
Newman gateway software or have implemented or are acquiring
gateway meeting the Exterior Gateway Protocol requirements
Acquisition of the Berkeley BSD 4.2 UNIX software might
considered evidence of the latter
Experimental networks which later become operational need
be renumbered. Rather, the identifiers could be moved from R&
to DoD or Commercial status. Thus, network identifiers
change state among R&D, DoD and commercial, but the number
identifiers allocated to each use should remain within
limits indicated above. To make possible this
assignment, it is recommended that the network
spaces not be allocated by simple partition but rather
specific assignment
Protocol
In general, all assignments will be made by the R&D community
but any numbers which become R&D, DoD, national
international standards will be marked as such in this RFC
Protocol identifiers 0 and 255 are reserved
95 protocol identifiers are allocated for assignment to
standards, 32 for R&D use, and 127 for Commercial, national
international standards
Port
A recommendation for allocation and assignment of port
is to be developed jointly by representatives of the ICCB
PSTP
ARPANET Link
All unnecessary link number usage will be eliminated by
effort of the ICCB, PSTP and BBN
BBN will give consideration to the use of link numbers
promote interoperability among various ARPANET interfaces
report to the ICCB, PSTP and DDN/PMO. Examples of
interoperability issues are
(i) interoperability of 1822 and X.25
(ii) interoperability of SIP and other
(iii) logical addressing or other special
Reynolds & Postel [Page 25]
Assigned Numbers RFC 870
APPENDIX
IP Version
These numbers will be assigned only by the R&D community
the purpose of exploring alternatives in internet
service expansion, such as inclusion of stream protocol (ST
services
TCP, IP and Telnet Option
These numbers will be assigned by the R&D community.
permanent or experimental assignments will be identified in
documents specifying those protcols
Implementation
This policy recommendation has not been fully implemented as yet
Currently, Joyce Reynolds is acting coordinator for all
assignments
Reynolds & Postel [Page 26]
if you see any problems within the linking, don't worry be happy,
this is version 0.1 of the Relevance System and you gotta expect some crappy subroutines sometimes,
just be content we did not write this in Java, which would have made this "bigger and better" HAHAHHA.
RFC documents can be found at I.E.T.F.
Relevance System Copyright © 2002 Spectrum WorldResearch
other technical nosh by ServerMasters Corporation
collaboration of BobX