As per Relevance of the word messages, we have this rfc below:




Network Working October 17, 1969
RFC-21
V.



At UCLA on October 10, there was a network meeting attended by

SDC

John Kreznar Vint
Dick Linde Steve
Marty Bleier Jon
Bob Long Michel




Ron
Nancy O'
George



Topics discussed

1. Revisions to BBN memo 1822

2. Revisions to NWG/RFC 11

3. Transmission of multiple control



1. Changes to BBN Memo No. 1822 (underlined
As informally communicated by Dave

p. 11 "The IMP program can handle up to 63 active transmit
and 63 active receive links at a time. If the Host attempts
send a message on a new link when 63 active transmit links
exist, a "Link Table Full" message will be sent from the IMP
the Host, and the message will be discarded."

p. 11 "1. Any link that is not used for a period of 26
will have its entry automatically deleted by the IMP program."



[Cerf: How about deleting only if the transmit link table is full

Crocker: No, because there is no other way for links to be
so they would always tend to accumulate. Furthermore
the table at one site may be full while another site
not be.]

p. 13 "5 Regular with discard."

This allows IMP systems to generate traffic which never
reaches any Hosts since it will be discarded when it reaches the
top of the IMP-HOST queue in the destination Host's IMP.
Network Measurement Center will make use of this feature

p. 13 Message type 6 is no longer assigned, and message type 10
is really in octal so is actually type 8. Types 9-15 are unassigned

p. 17 Type 10 is really type 8.

2. Revisions to NWG/RFC 11

This memo has been obsoleted by developments at UCLA
discussions with other nodes. NWG/RFC 22 contains some of
major changes. An updated version of NWG/RFC 11 is forthcoming

3. George Gregg of UCSB will publish NWG/RFC 23 concerning
transmission of multiple control messages over control links



if you see any problems within the linking, don't worry be happy,
this is version 0.1 of the Relevance System and you gotta expect some crappy subroutines sometimes,
just be content we did not write this in Java, which would have made this "bigger and better" HAHAHHA.



RFC documents can be found at I.E.T.F.



Relevance System Copyright © 2002 Spectrum WorldResearch
other technical nosh by ServerMasters Corporation
collaboration of BobX






Spectrum